The analysis reveals infrared closure failure affecting the Hubble constant in cosmic expansion.
The persistent discrepancy between early- and late-time determinations of the Hubble constant is usually framed as a disagreement between inferred values of the same cosmological parameter. The central claim of the present work is stronger and more structural: the tension is argued to be the observational imprint of an infrared closure failure. Within the CLEO–LOP framework, the late-time expansion history is not treated as the trivial output of a purely local background law, but as a bounded causal–entropic flow governed by the infrared state variable u(N) ≡ −dlnH2 dN , N≡lna. (1) The key quantity tested in this work is the closure observable C(z) ≡ u′ u(3 −u) , (2) which isolates the dynamical structure beyond the universal bounded infrared factors. Using late-time background probes — cosmic chronometers, Pantheon+ supernovae, and DESI baryon acoustic oscillations — the reconstructed C(z) is confronted with local and non-local closure classes. The analysis shows that the local class is decisively rejected, while a minimal causal non-local extension with relaxative memory is overwhelmingly favored. In this preferred sector, the inferred value of the Hubble constant becomes closure-dependent and is shifted upward relative to the local minimal class, toward the late-time side of the observed tension. The significance of this result is physical rather than merely statistical. It implies that late-time cosmic acceleration is not most naturally described as the output of a rigid local prescription, but as the endpoint of a history-dependent infrared relaxation process. In this interpretation, the Hubble tension is elevated from a parameter discrepancy to a direct observational probe of the dynamical nature of cosmic acceleration itself.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Fernando Cesar Coelho Coutinho (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: