Proposes a novel BRIC strategy that significantly improves SNV detection accuracy in clinical samples, indicating potential for better diagnostics.
With the introduction of the RPA-based CRISPR-Cas12a method, crRNA allostery and Cas12a protein engineering have been applied to the identification of single-nucleotide variants (SNVs). However, the complicated testing procedure often falls short of the intended simple and rapid objectives of CRISPR-based diagnostics (CRISPR-Dx), and the discrimination factor (DF) for SNV distinction remains suboptimal (DF = 2–5). In this study, we proposed a one-tube “Blocking RPA-coupled Inhibiting CRISPR-Cas12a” (BRIC) cascade strategy that features a dual recognition of SNVs. In the BRIC cascade, a reduction of RPA amplification products of wild-type target (WT) and WT-activated Cas12a cleavage lowered the WT detection signal to near-background levels, without compromising the efficiency of RPA or CRISPR-Cas12a. With HLA-B*15:02TA (rs3909184, G > C), a gene associated with drug-induced cutaneous rash, as the SNV target, the proposed one-tube BRIC strategy achieved a DF of 32.51, with the WT signal approximating the background level, thereby greatly enhancing SNV detection specificity. On the other hand, MT can be detected in a large number of WT (with a resolution of 0.1%). Within the HLA-B*15:02TA concentration (CMT) range of 5.0 × 10–7 to 1.0 × 10–3 nM (500 aM to 1 pM), a linear relationship was evident between the fluorescence signal (FMT) and lgCMT (FMT = 4146.55 + 578.09lgCMT; R2 = 0.9904), with a detection limit of 67.6 aM (>3σ). Combined with a 3D-printed portable fluorimeter, the proposed method reported high consistency with next-generation sequencing in detecting HLA-B*15:02TA in 22 clinical plasma samples, validating the reliability of the one-tube BRIC cascade assay. These improvements in assay design, process, and DF highlight the promising potentials of the BRIC strategy in clinical settings.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lin et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: