PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 6, 2026Lupus0 citations

Development and evaluation of frailty index for patients with systemic lupus erythematosus in China

View Full Paper
MZMeng-Yao ZhangMNMei-Qing NieQTQian Tang

Key Points

  • The aim is to create a valid and reliable frailty assessment scale for patients with systemic lupus erythematosus.
  • Developed an initial draft through literature review and expert consultations.
  • Conducted pre-survey and formal survey for validation.
  • Evaluated validity and reliability using various statistical methods.
  • Final scale reduced to 14 items from an initial 32 after pilot testing.
  • Cronbach’s α was 0.809, indicating strong reliability.
  • The optimal cutoff for pre-frailty is 28.5; for frailty, it is 40.5.

Abstract

Objective To develop and validate a frailty assessment scale tailored for patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Methods Based on the theory of the frailty integration model, an initial draft of the frailty index questionnaire was developed through a comprehensive literature review and a two - round Delphi expert consultation. The final version of the scale was formed through a pre - survey and a formal survey. The validity of the questionnaire was tested using content validity, structural validity, and criterion - related validity. The reliability was evaluated using Cronbach’s α coefficient, split - half reliability, and test - retest reliability. Results The initial item pool of the scale contained 3 dimensions and 32 items. After two rounds of Delphi expert consultations, the draft scale was refined to 21 items across 3 dimensions. Pilot testing with 50 SLE patients further reduced it to 14 items. The formal content validity Cronbach’s α coefficient was 0.809, the split - half reliability was 0.745, the KMO was 0.820, and the Bartlett’s test value was 2915.855 ( p < 0.001). The results of exploratory factor analysis showed that, except for a few items, the correlation coefficient between the score of each item and its score in the corresponding dimension was greater than 0.4, and the overall correlation coefficient was 0.832 ( p < 0.001). The optimal cutoff value for the pre - frailty stage was 28.5, and that for the frailty stage was 40.5. Conclusion The frailty index scale developed in this study is a valid and reliable tool for assessing frailty in SLE patients in China, with potential utility in clinical and research settings.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Zhang et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69d34e579c07852e0af97e2fhttps://doi.org/10.1177/09612033261438992
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Prevalence of frailty and prefrailty in systemic lupus erythematosus: A systematic review and meta-analysis2025 · 9 citations
  2. 2Prevalence of remission and its effect on damage and quality of life in Chinese patients with systemic lupus erythematosus2017 · 93 citations
  3. 3In Search of an Integral Conceptual Definition of Frailty: Opinions of Experts2010 · 399 citations
  4. 4Best practice guidelines for the management of frailty: a British Geriatrics Society, Age UK and Royal College of General Practitioners report2014 · 703 citations
  5. 5The ability of three different models of frailty to predict all-cause mortality: Results from the European Male Aging Study (EMAS)2013 · 156 citations