PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 6, 2026International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology4 citationsOpen Access

Mitigating chromium (VI) toxicity through microbial and biotechnological innovations: a critical review

PSPaavan SinghalVSV. SharmaRKR. Kumar

Key Points

  • The review aims to evaluate microbial and biotechnological methods for reducing chromium (VI) toxicity in the environment.
  • Review of conventional physicochemical methods for chromium removal
  • Evaluation of microbial strategies like biosorption and biotransformation
  • Analysis of microbial resistance genes and enzymatic systems
  • Discussion on the design of microbial consortia
  • Comparison of traditional and biological remediation methods
  • Conventional methods often generate secondary pollutants and are costly
  • Microbial strategies show a sustainable and effective approach for Cr (VI) detoxification
  • Bacteria and fungi play critical roles in reducing Cr (VI) to Cr (III)
  • Biotechnological advancements enhance microbial remediation efficacy
  • Microbial systems demonstrate superior scalability for large-scale environmental treatment

Abstract

Abstract Hexavalent chromium Cr (VI) is a prevalent and highly toxic environmental contaminant known for its persistence and severe ecological and health consequences. Its high solubility and mobility contribute to long-lasting pollution, while its carcinogenic properties pose significant risks to living organisms. Conventional physicochemical methods such as precipitation, ion exchange, and membrane filtration are employed for Cr (VI) removal but often suffer from drawbacks including high costs, incomplete elimination, and generation of secondary pollutants. In contrast, microbial and biotechnological methods offer sustainable, environmentally friendly alternatives for detoxifying Cr (VI). This review focuses on microbial remediation strategies, including biosorption, bioaccumulation, biotransformation, and bioleaching, with particular attention to the roles of bacteria and fungi. Key factors discussed include microbial resistance genes and enzymatic systems that facilitate the reduction of Cr (VI) to the less harmful Cr (III). Advances in designing microbial consortia, understanding genetic regulation, and integrating bioprocess engineering are also explored to enhance remediation efficacy. Comparing traditional and biological approaches highlights the superior sustainability and scalability of microbial systems for large-scale environmental treatment. Innovations in microbial bioremediation through biotechnological approaches present a promising path forward for mitigating chromium pollution and restoring environmental health in contaminated ecosystems.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Singhal et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69d34e579c07852e0af97e72https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-026-07141-0
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper