Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This manuscript addresses gaps in evidence-based medicine, proposing a framework for individual-level decisions, indicating its importance for clinical practice.
This deposit contains an archival draft of a conceptual manuscript addressing a structural issue in evidence-based medicine: the gap between population-level average effects and individual-level clinical decision-making. The manuscript proposes that the common translation from “better on average” to “better for this patient” constitutes an implicit inferential step, grounded in the unobservability of individual counterfactual outcomes. It introduces the concept of a projective decision pathway, defined as a framework that integrates trial evidence, mechanistic reasoning, and clinical experience to support anticipatory and corrigible decision-making at the individual level. This version is deposited for timestamping purposes to establish precedence of the conceptual framework and its associated terminology.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Qiulong Liang (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: