Retrospective cohort study develops a model predicting Pneumocystis pneumonia risk in vasculitis, suggesting better prophylaxis strategies.
Objectives In patients with ANCA–associated vasculitis (AAV), Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia (PJP) is a potentially fatal complication. As treatment intensity typically changes over time, PJP risk also changes, making fixed prophylaxis strategies suboptimal. We aimed to develop a time-dependent prediction model to guide individualized decisions on PJP prophylaxis. Methods We conducted a retrospective cohort study using a nationwide claims database. Patients newly diagnosed with AAV between 2015 and 2024 were included. Candidate predictors included demographics, comorbidities, and monthly-updated medication use. A flexible parametric survival model was developed to predict the risk of PJP. Discrimination, calibration and clinical utility were evaluated by internal-external cross-validation (IECV) to investigate model’s generalizability. Results Among 15 649,036 individuals in the database, 2,751 patients with AAV were included. Of them, 170 (6.2%) developed PJP. The final model included age, monthly maximum glucocorticoid dose, use of rituximab, cyclophosphamide, and PJP prophylaxis. In the IECV, the time-dependent C-index was 0.70 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.60–0.79) at 2 months and 0.66 (95% CI 0.61–0.71) at 12 months; calibration was generally acceptable. In the clinical utility analysis, per 1,000 patients with AAV including 61 PJP cases, 948 would be recommended prophylaxis with a monthly risk threshold of 1.0%. Of them, 643 had not received it, with 34 potentially preventable PJP cases, and 336 could have discontinued prophylaxis during follow-up. Conclusion We developed a time-dependent model to predict the risk of PJP in patients with AAV. The model may support more appropriate, individualized prophylaxis decisions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Takada et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: