A feasibility study evaluates RSO detectability in a bi-static configuration, highlighting innovative radar use for space awareness.
The continuous growth of the population of Resident Space Objects (RSOs) poses increasing challenges for Space Situational Awareness (SSA), particularly in terms of detection capability and collision risk mitigation. Ground-based radar systems represent a primary class of remote sensing instruments for RSO observation; however, their deployment is often constrained by cost and infrastructure requirements. In this context, the reuse of existing large radio astronomy facilities as radar receivers offers an innovative and potentially cost-effective alternative. This paper presents a fully model-based feasibility study of S-band bi-static radar observations of RSOs using the Sardinia Radio Telescope (SRT) as a high-sensitivity ground-based receiver. The analysis is entirely analytical and is conducted in the absence of experimental radar measurements. A bi-static radar equation framework is adopted to evaluate received signal power and the resulting signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) as functions of target size, range, and observation geometry. The model explicitly incorporates thermal noise, integration time and target dynamics, radio-frequency interference (RFI), atmospheric and environmental clutter contributions, and the realistic antenna radiation pattern of the SRT through a Gaussian beam approximation. Detection thresholds, maximum observable ranges, and performance envelopes are derived for representative RSO dimensions, and the impact of off-boresight reception on detectability is quantified. The results define the operational conditions under which RSOs may be detected in an S-band bi-static configuration and demonstrate the potential of the SRT as a non-conventional ground-based instrument for space object observation, supporting future developments in SSA and space debris monitoring strategies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Luca Schirru (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: