We present the complete cosmological predictions of the 5D e-dimension framework introduced in Paper 1, computed using the CAMB Boltzmann solver (v1.6.6). The framework fits zero parameters to CMB data. Two observational inputs — the dark energy density ρ_Λ (which fixes the e-circle circumference L in Paper 1) and the dark-to-visible matter ratio Ω_DM/Ω_b (which fixes the brane temperature ratio ξ through the scaling law below) — together with the Standard Model field content, Planck inflation parameters (inherited unchanged from ΛCDM), and a thawing dilaton dark energy equation of state (w₀ = −0.85, w_a = −0.23, derived from the Casimir + Goldberger-Wise potential in Paper 1), determine every cosmological observable. The central discovery of this paper is the scaling law — derived from temperature-asymmetric bulk leptogenesis on the Z₂ orbifold — that fixes ξ: Ω_DM / Ω_b = 1/ξ² where ξ = T_hidden/T_visible is the hidden-to-visible brane temperature ratio. The three bulk right-handed neutrinos (required by the orbifold Casimir calculation) deposit baryon asymmetries on both branes; the entropy asymmetry (1/ξ³) and washout suppression (1/ξ²) combine to give η_ratio = 1/ξ⁵, which reduces to Ω_DM/Ω_b = 1/ξ² after multiplying by ξ³. Inverting using the observed ratio Ω_DM/Ω_b = 5.36 gives ξ = 0.432 at leading order. The washout correction — κ ~ 1/(K ln K) rather than 1/K — introduces a logarithmic factor f(K,ξ) = ln K / ln(Kξ²) that shifts the corrected ξ to ≈ 0.49 for the framework's Yukawa coupling (y ~ 0.45, K ~ 460). This corrected value converges with the independently θ*-matched ξ = 0.47, providing a non-trivial consistency check. Three scenarios bracket the prediction: Scenario A (θ*-matched, ξ = 0.47): H₀ = 69.5 km/s/Mpc, S8 = 0.753, θ* offset = −0.5" from Planck. Scenario B (leading-order 1/ξ² law, ξ = 0.432): H₀ = 68.7 km/s/Mpc, S8 = 0.785, θ* offset = +6.6". Scenario C (self-consistent ω_b, ξ = 0.4375): H₀ = 68.8 km/s/Mpc, S8 = 0.754, θ* offset = +1.0", at the cost of a ~2.5σ D/H tension. The complete prediction set, computed by CAMB across all three scenarios: Age of the universe: t₀ = 13.47–13.60 Gyr — 200–330 Myr younger than Planck ΛCDM, arising from the higher H₀ predicted by hidden-brane dark radiation (ΔN_eff = 6.14 × ξ⁴ = 0.21–0.30). S8 tension resolved: S8 = 0.753–0.785, matching all major weak lensing surveys (DES Y3: 0.776 ± 0.017, KiDS-1000: 0.759 ± 0.024, HSC Y3: 0.763 ± 0.020) within 1σ, resolving the 4σ discrepancy with Planck ΛCDM (0.832). The mechanism: elevated N_eff suppresses early clustering, evolving w(z) modifies the growth rate, and lower Ω_m = 0.290–0.302 directly reduces S8. Expansion history: The thawing dilaton (w₀ = −0.85, w_a = −0.23) drives H(z) to peak 4–6% above ΛCDM at z ~ 0.3–0.7, with a specific fingerprint testable by DESI DR3 at 8σ significance. The framework prediction lies within the DESI DR2 2σ contour (w₀ = −0.75, w_a = −0.75) but predicts milder evolution. Sound horizon: r_d = 145.8–146.2 Mpc (0.6–0.9% below Planck). Neutrino sector: The bulk seesaw mechanism (Paper 1) predicts Σm_ν = 0.06 eV with normal mass ordering from the Z₃ orbifold geometry, testable by JUNO within 6 years. The cosmic coincidence explained: Ω_DM/Ω_b ≈ 5 is no longer a coincidence — it is a geometric consequence of the two-brane thermal history. The ratio is 1/ξ², where ξ is fixed by bulk leptogenesis. All three scenarios predict N_eff = 3.31–3.39, the framework's most falsifiable near-term prediction. This value is in 3–4σ tension with ACT DR6 (N_eff = 2.86 ± 0.13), though the combined ACT+SPT+Planck measurement (N_eff = 2.81 ± 0.12) is itself 1.9σ below the Standard Model prediction of 3.043, and when SH0ES H₀ data are included the preferred value shifts to N_eff = 3.43 ± 0.13 (Garcia Escudero & Abazajian 2025) — consistent with the framework. A CAMB computation of the mirror-sector thermal history shows that mirror e± undergo Boltzmann suppression at BBN (T_mirror ≈ 0.43 MeV vs m_e = 0.511 MeV), producing a time-varying ΔN_eff: at recombination, the effective mirror contribution is ΔN_eff ≈ 0.36 (ξ = 0.47), suppressed by a factor 0.49 relative to the fully relativistic limit, as the mirror e± annihilate and heat the mirror photon bath — giving total N_eff ≈ 3.40. CMB-S4 (σ(N_eff) ≈ 0.03) will confirm or exclude the mirror sector at > 9σ. CMB-S4 will confirm or exclude the mirror sector at > 9σ. DESI DR3 will test H(z) at 8σ. Euclid will test S8 at 16σ relative to Planck ΛCDM. JUNO will test the neutrino mass ordering. The decade 2025–2035 will decide.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
G Six (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: