Proposes new hardness descriptors and shows their effectiveness in predicting material properties and exploring crystal structures.
We propose and systematically compare ten physically motivated hardness descriptors based exclusively on the six eigenvalues (λ₁ ≤ λ₂ ≤ ··· ≤ λ₆) of the elastic stiffness tensor in Voigt notation. The models are trained on a curated 45-material dataset using elastic tensors from the GRACE-2L machine-learning interatomic potential and experimental Vickers hardness traced to primary sources. The best model, CV-λ (HV = 0.123·λ⁰·⁸⁷⁴harm·CV⁻⁰·⁹²⁶), achieves R² = 0.911 and MAE = 3.91 GPa, outperforming the classical Teter (R² = 0.818), Tian (R² = 0.878), and Mazhnik–Oganov (R² = 0.856) models. Cross-validation confirms robust generalisation (CV R² = 0.826). All anisotropy descriptors are near-equivalent (r(CV, 1−PR) = 1.000). A blind DFT transferability test shows GRACE-based predictions systematically outperform DFT-based ones. Beyond hardness prediction, we demonstrate that the eigenvectors of the stiffness tensor define physically motivated search directions for crystal structure exploration: preliminary application to the Nb–B system via eigenvalue directed exploration (EDE) recovers 3 of 6 known experimental phases with exact space group symmetry, identifies hard candidates overlooked by energy-driven evolutionary search (USPEX), and recovers 4 of 5 OQMD reference phases.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pavlo Prysyazhnyuk (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: