Ghana faces a housing deficit exceeding 1.8 million units (projected to surpass 2 million within 3–5 years) amid rapid urbanization and a growing middle class. This study applies the author’s original facetist methodology — an interdisciplinary triangulation of systems theory, complexity and chaos science, game theory, Austrian economics, and the human legacy drive — to identify the highest-leverage solution. Through a meta-analysis of 70+ empirical studies (2020–2026), the research compares Ghana’s strengths (Rawlings-era political stability and recent debt reduction to ~55 % of GDP) with Portugal and Spain’s cautionary failures. The facetist synthesis reveals a single, practical intervention: a simple 10 % flat tax on residential construction combined with the complete elimination of permitting requirements. Key projected outcomes (conservative estimates): • 15.2 % reduction in average family-home costs • +10,000 additional homes built annually • +50,000 new local construction jobs per year • GHS 450 million boost in secondary spending on furniture and appliances • Net government revenue gain of GHS 600–900 million annually through dynamic growth (Laffer-curve effects) The reform empowers local Ghanaian SMEs over foreign (China/Turkey) prefab dominance, reverses rural exodus pressures, strengthens middle-class wealth creation, and avoids the bureaucratic and monetary traps observed in Iberia. It delivers a clear win-win: affordable homes and legacy-building opportunities for citizens, plus higher sustainable revenue for the state.
Kai Hermann Kayser (2026) studied this question.