This critical review analyzes analytical performance in real samples using various polymer-based biosensors, highlighting implications for practical applications.
Polymer-based biosensors have evolved from passive supports into active functional elements that dictate analytical performance in complex real-world samples. This critical review with meta-trend analysis examines 96 original research articles published between 2015 and 2025, evaluating how four polymer classes (conductive polymers, redox-mediator polymers, hydrogels, and molecularly imprinted polymers) address matrix effects in food, beverage, environmental and clinical applications. Electrochemical detection dominates (79% of studies), with conductive polymers enabling low-potential operation that excludes electroactive interference. Hydrogels achieve superior precision (RSD below 3%) in protein-rich matrices through biocompatible microenvironments that preserve enzyme kinetics. Molecularly imprinted polymers provide unmatched stability in harsh environments for trace-level detection of heavy metals and toxins, though delayed response times from slow analyte diffusion persist. Critical evaluation exposes validation deficits: 91% of studies omit limits of quantification, while approximately one-third lack reproducibility (33%) and precision (30%). The multi-matrix challenge, maintaining calibration across different hostile environments, remains the primary barrier to commercial deployment. Advanced architectures, including nanocapsulation, hierarchical nanocomposites, and microneedle-integrated systems, offer pathways to overcome limitations in fouling resistance and operational stability.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mascini et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: