Why the study?
Do upstream anticoagulants (factor XIa inhibitors) provide a safer bleeding profile compared to NOACs and VKAs in patients requiring anticoagulation?
Do upstream anticoagulants (factor XIa inhibitors) provide a safer bleeding profile compared to NOACs and VKAs in patients requiring anticoagulation?
Upstream anticoagulants, such as factor XIa inhibitors, represent a promising future strategy to reduce bleeding complications compared to current NOAC and VKA therapies.
Residual bleeding with NOACs supports testing factor XIa inhibitors; leaves open confirmation versus standards in RCTs.
Introduction: For a long time, vitamin K antagonists (VKA) have been the preferred drugs for the anticoagulation management of both atrial fibrillation and venous thromboembolism. Hereby, the major purpose is to attenuate the onset of thrombosis without affecting hemostasis.Areas covered: Nowadays, non-vitamin K anticoagulants (NOAC), a new class of oral anticoagulants is available for the above-mentioned indications. NOAC are at least as effective and safer with regard to intracranial bleedings compared to VKA, but major bleedings still occur. For this reason, the search for safer anticoagulants is still ongoing.Expert commentary: There are several unmet needs in NOAC management, including selection of optimal drug and dose, uncertainty on specific conditions and lack of drug persistence. There remains to be an important need for safer anticoagulants; ‘upstream’ anticoagulants including inhibitors of factor XIa may provide additional benefit related to fewer bleeding complications.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gulpen et al. (2016) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: