PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 1, 2009The Tohoku Journal of Experimental Medicine145 citationsOpen Access

Responsive Measures to Prehabilitation in Patients Undergoing Bowel Resection Surgery

DKDo Jun KimNMNancy E. MayoFCFranco Carli

Structured PICO

Does a 4-week pre-surgical aerobic exercise program improve measures of aerobic fitness in patients undergoing bowel resection surgery?

P
Population
21 subjects scheduled for major bowel resection (colorectal surgery)
I
Intervention
3.8 +/- 1.2 weeks (27 +/- 8 sessions) of progressive, structured pre-surgical aerobic exercise training at 40 to 65% of heart rate reserve (%HRR)
C
Comparator
Control group (no structured pre-surgical aerobic exercise training)
O
Outcome
Most responsive measure of aerobic fitnesssurrogate

A four-week prehabilitation aerobic exercise program improves submaximal heart rate, oxygen uptake, and peak power output in patients awaiting colorectal surgery.

Abstract

Surgical patients often show physiological and metabolic distress, muscle weakness, and long hospital stays. Physical conditioning might help recovery. We attempted to identify the most responsive measure of aerobic fitness from a four-week pre-surgical aerobic exercise program (prehabilitation) in patients undergoing major bowel resection. Twenty-one subjects randomized two to one (exercise: control) scheduled for colorectal surgery. Fourteen subjects Body Mass Index (BMI) = 27 +/- 6 kg/m(2); maximal oxygen uptake (VO(2max)) = 22 +/- 10 ml/kg/min underwent 3.8 +/- 1.2 weeks (27 +/- 8 sessions) of progressive, structured pre-surgical aerobic exercise training at 40 to 65% of heart rate reserve (%HRR). Peak power output was the only maximal measure that was responsive to training 26 +/- 27%, Effects Size (ES) = 0.24; Standardized Response Mean (SRM) = 1.05; p < 0.05. For the submaximal measures, heart rate and oxygen uptake during submaximal exercise was most responsive to training (decrease by 13% +/- 15%, ES = -0.24; SRM = -0.57; and 7% +/- 6%, ES = -0.40; SRM -0.97; p < 0.05) at an exercise intensity of 76 +/- 47 W. There was no change to maximal or submaximal measures in the control group. The distance walked over six minutes improved in both groups (by approximately 30 m), but the effect size and t-statistic were higher in the exercise group. Heart rate and oxygen uptake during submaximal exercise, and peak power output are the most responsive measures to four weeks of prehabilitation in subjects with low initial fitness.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Kim et al. (2009) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69d56f7975589c71d767d8fchttps://doi.org/10.1620/tjem.217.109
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Effect of a Preoperative Intervention on Preoperative and Postoperative Outcomes in Low-Risk Patients Awaiting Elective Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery2000 · 467 citations
  2. 2Effect Sizes for Interpreting Changes in Health Status1989 · 2,416 citations
  3. 3Psychophysical bases of perceived exertion1982 · 16,607 citations
  4. 4ACSM's guidelines for exercise testing and prescription2014 · 9,488 citations
  5. 5Editorial I2001 · 56 citations