PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
October 2, 2015Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology95 citationsOpen Access

Point‐by‐Point Radiofrequency Ablation Versus the Cryoballoon or a Novel Combined Approach: A Randomized Trial Comparing 3 Methods of Pulmonary Vein Isolation for Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation (The Cryo Versus RF Trial)

View Full Paper
RHRoss J. HunterVBVictoria BakerMFMalcolm Finlay

Structured PICO

Does cryoballoon ablation or a combined approach improve single procedure success rate compared to point-by-point radiofrequency ablation in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation?

P
Population
Patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation
I
Intervention
Cryoballoon ablation (CRYO) or a novel combined approach
C
Comparator
Conventional point-by-point radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA)
O
Outcome
Single procedure success rate and procedure time

Cryoballoon ablation is faster and achieves a higher single-procedure success rate than conventional radiofrequency ablation for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation, with no added benefit from a combined approach.

Abstract

Pulmonary vein isolation for paroxysmal AF is faster with CRYO and results in a higher single procedure success rate than conventional point by point RFCA. The COMBINED approach was not superior to CRYO alone.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Hunter et al. (2015) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69d56fb075589c71d767da92https://doi.org/10.1111/jce.12846
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper