Why the study?
cMyBP-C phosphorylation is lower in septal myectomies of HCM patients than non-failing hearts, prompting comparison of phosphomimetic versus wild-type cMyBP-C gene transfer.
Does phosphomimetic cMyBP-C gene transfer rescue the cardiomyopathy phenotype better than wild-type cMyBP-C in a murine engineered heart tissue model of HCM?
Population
Engineered heart tissues generated from a mouse model carrying a Mybpc3 mutation
Comparison
Phosphomimetic (D282) vs wild-type (S282) cMyBP-C gene transfer
Design
In vitro experimental study
Authors
Loading...
Should not yet change HCM management; extends preclinical data favoring wild-type over phosphomimetic cMyBP-C gene transfer.
Does phosphomimetic cMyBP-C gene transfer rescue the cardiomyopathy phenotype better than wild-type cMyBP-C in a murine engineered heart tissue model of HCM?
Wild-type (S282) cMyBP-C gene transfer is more effective than phosphomimetic (D282) cMyBP-C at normalizing force-calcium relationships and gene expression in a murine engineered heart tissue model of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.
Dutsch et al. (2019) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: