Why the study?
Influenza vaccination may benefit coronary disease patients, but both infection and vaccination are linked to acute inflammation that could trigger cardiovascular events.
Does influenza infection or vaccination alter the short-term risk of myocardial infarction?
Does influenza infection or vaccination alter the short-term risk of myocardial infarction?
Influenza infection significantly increases the short-term risk of myocardial infarction, whereas influenza vaccination is safe and associated with a short-term decrease in MI risk, though potentially influenced by healthy period bias.
Infection acutely raises MI risk while vaccination lowers it; supports targeted use but remains hypothesis-generating pending RCTs.
Introduction: Influenza vaccination may be beneficial in coronary disease patients; however the infection and vaccination are associated with acute inflammation, a trigger of cardiovascular events. We aimed to review the risk of myocardial infarction (MI) associated with Influenza infection and the safety of vaccination in self-controlled case series (SCCS).Methods: We performed a systematic review with meta-analysis of SCCS studies to evaluate the risk of MI associated with Influenza infection/vaccination. Database search was performed in August/2018. The data were reported using the incident rate ratio (IRR) and 95% confidence interval (95%CI).Results: three studies for Influenza infection and two studies for Influenza vaccination were eligible. The risk of MI following an Influenza infection was significantly increased in the first 3 days (IRR 5.79; 95%CI: 3.59–9.38) and between 4-7 days (IRR 4.52; 95%CI: 2.80–7.32). In the first 4 weeks following the Influenza vaccination, there was a significant decrease of MI risk (IRR 0.84, 95%CI: 0.78–0.91).Conclusions: Short-term MI risk in Influenza infection is significantly increased, with a low-to-moderate confidence in the pooled evidence. The Influenza vaccine was safe regarding the short-term risk for MI, and the risk reduction is possibly related to a healthy period bias.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Caldeira et al. (2019) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: