Why the study?
Does intracoronary thrombolytic therapy improve reperfusion in patients with acute myocardial infarction admitted within eight hours of symptoms?
Does intracoronary thrombolytic therapy improve reperfusion in patients with acute myocardial infarction admitted within eight hours of symptoms?
Intracoronary thrombolytic therapy is feasible and achieves successful reperfusion in single vessel occlusions when performed within a Coronary Care Unit.
May support intracoronary thrombolysis feasibility in early MI; leaves open randomized efficacy confirmation.
Acute myocardial infarction is associated with a high incidence of occluding coronary arterial thrombi. Thrombolytic therapy has been advocated to restore coronary artery blood flow and to reduce myocardial damage. Coronary arteriography and intracoronary thrombolytic therapy was administered to 61 patients admitted to a Coronary Care Unit within eight hours of symptoms. Successful reperfusion was obtained in 38 of 46 single vessel occlusions associated with a first coronary attack. Failure of reperfusion occurred in patients with two vessel occlusions or with cardiogenic shock. This study demonstrates the feasibility of applying this technique within a Coronary Care Unit with low capital and running costs, and suggests that its widespread application is possible even within the setting of a District General Hospital.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hillis et al. (1986) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: