PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
October 1, 2019American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine4,279 citationsOpen Access

Standardization of Spirometry 2019 Update. An Official American Thoracic Society and European Respiratory Society Technical Statement

View Full Paper
BGBrian L. GrahamISIrene SteenbruggenMMMartin R. Miller

Key Points

  • The aim is to update technical standards for spirometry based on new research and technological advancements.
  • Developed by an international joint task force from the American Thoracic Society and the European Respiratory Society.
  • Reviewed published evidence comprehensively and created a patient survey to gather experiences.
  • Developed recommendations for best practices based on expertise and new findings.
  • Revisions to the 2005 spirometry standards were made, incorporating previously unconsidered factors.
  • Cited evidence supports the revisions and recommendations put forth by the task force.
  • An online guide was created to assist in implementing the updated standards.

Abstract

Background: Spirometry is the most common pulmonary function test. It is widely used in the assessment of lung function to provide objective information used in the diagnosis of lung diseases and monitoring lung health. In 2005, the American Thoracic Society and the European Respiratory Society jointly adopted technical standards for conducting spirometry. Improvements in instrumentation and computational capabilities, together with new research studies and enhanced quality assurance approaches, have led to the need to update the 2005 technical standards for spirometry to take full advantage of current technical capabilities.Methods: This spirometry technical standards document was developed by an international joint task force, appointed by the American Thoracic Society and the European Respiratory Society, with expertise in conducting and analyzing pulmonary function tests, laboratory quality assurance, and developing international standards. A comprehensive review of published evidence was performed. A patient survey was developed to capture patients' experiences.Results: Revisions to the 2005 technical standards for spirometry were made, including the addition of factors that were not previously considered. Evidence to support the revisions was cited when applicable. The experience and expertise of task force members were used to develop recommended best practices.Conclusions: Standards and consensus recommendations are presented for manufacturers, clinicians, operators, and researchers with the aims of increasing the accuracy, precision, and quality of spirometric measurements and improving the patient experience. A comprehensive guide to aid in the implementation of these standards was developed as an online supplement.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Graham et al. (2019) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69d5716575589c71d767e157https://doi.org/10.1164/rccm.201908-1590st
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper