Key result
Accelerated diagnostic protocols provide safe, accurate, and cost-effective evaluation for low-risk chest pain.
Why the study?
Management of low-risk patients presenting to emergency departments with chest pain is challenging due to the need to distinguish urgent from benign conditions and to optimize admission decisions.
Are accelerated diagnostic protocols safe, accurate, and cost-effective for managing low-risk patients presenting to the emergency department with chest pain?
Are accelerated diagnostic protocols safe, accurate, and cost-effective for managing low-risk patients presenting to the emergency department with chest pain?
Accelerated diagnostic protocols using serial ECGs, biomarkers, and imaging are safe and cost-effective for evaluating low-risk chest pain in the emergency department.
Supports consideration in low-risk ED chest pain; leaves open need for RCTs before practice change.
The management of low-risk patients presenting to emergency departments is a common and challenging clinical problem entailing 8 million emergency department visits annually. Although a majority of these patients do not have a life-threatening condition, the clinician must distinguish between those who require urgent treatment of a serious problem and those with more benign entities who do not require admission. Inadvertent discharge of patients with acute coronary syndrome from the emergency department is associated with increased mortality and liability, whereas inappropriate admission of patients without serious disease is neither indicated nor cost-effective. Clinical judgment and basic clinical tools (history, physical examination, and electrocardiogram) remain primary in meeting this challenge and affording early identification of low-risk patients with chest pain. Additionally, established and newer diagnostic methods have extended clinicians' diagnostic capacity in this setting. Low-risk patients presenting with chest pain are increasingly managed in chest pain units in which accelerated diagnostic protocols are performed, comprising serial electrocardiograms and cardiac injury markers to exclude acute coronary syndrome. Patients with negative findings usually complete the accelerated diagnostic protocol with a confirmatory test to exclude ischemia. This is typically an exercise treadmill test or a cardiac imaging study if the exercise treadmill test is not applicable. Rest myocardial perfusion imaging has assumed an important role in this setting. Computed tomography coronary angiography has also shown promise in this setting. A negative accelerated diagnostic protocol evaluation allows discharge, whereas patients with positive findings are admitted. This approach has been found to be safe, accurate, and cost-effective in low-risk patients presenting with chest pain.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Amsterdam et al. (2010) conducted a review in Chest pain in low-risk patients. Accelerated diagnostic protocols was evaluated. Accelerated diagnostic protocols using serial electrocardiograms, cardiac markers, and confirmatory testing offer a safe, accurate, and cost-effective approach for managing low-risk chest pain.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: