Why the study?
Persistent AF management remains challenging despite catheter ablation advances, but recent developments in conduction system pacing have revived interest in AV node ablation by overcoming pacing-induced cardiomyopathy.
Does atrioventricular node ablation combined with conduction system pacing improve outcomes in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation?
Does atrioventricular node ablation combined with conduction system pacing improve outcomes in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation?
Atrioventricular node ablation combined with conduction system pacing is emerging as a valuable 'pace-and-ablate' strategy for managing persistent atrial fibrillation while mitigating pacing-induced cardiomyopathy.
Supports evaluation of AV node ablation plus conduction system pacing in persistent AF; leaves open confirmation versus conventional pacing in randomized trials.
Despite key advances in catheter-based treatments, the management of persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) remains a therapeutic challenge in a significant subset of patients. While success rates have improved with repeat AF ablation procedures and the concurrent use of antiarrhythmic drugs, the likelihood of maintaining sinus rhythm during long-term follow-up is still limited. Atrioventricular node ablation (AVNA) has returned as a valuable treatment option given the recent developments in cardiac pacing. With the advent of conduction system pacing, AVNA has seen a revival where pacing-induced cardiomyopathy after AVNA is felt to be overcome. This review will discuss the role of permanent pacemaker implantation and AVNA for AF management in this new era of conduction system pacing. Specifically, this review will discuss the haemodynamic consequences of AF and the mechanisms through which 'pace-and-ablate therapy' enhances outcomes, analyse historical and more recent literature across various pacing methods, and work to identify patient groups that may benefit from earlier implementation of this approach.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Joza et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: