Experimental assessment of vertical greenery systems in reinforced concrete buildings, revealing kinematic behaviors of integrated components.
The integration of vertical greenery systems (VGSs) into existing reinforced concrete (RC) buildings raises questions regarding interface kinematics and the permanent displacement of soil-retaining elements under seismic excitation. This study experimentally investigates the residual displacement of façade-mounted living walls and rooftop planter pods anchored to a deficient RC frame under shake table excitation. A 1:3 scale reinforced concrete frame was tested in two distinct phases: initially as a deficient, unretrofitted structure (Phase A), and subsequently as a retrofitted system integrated with vertical greenery elements (Phase B). High-precision terrestrial laser scanning (TLS) was employed before and after successive seismic excitation stages to generate dense three-dimensional point clouds. Cloud-to-cloud comparison techniques were used to quantify global structural displacement and local kinematic behavior of greenery components, while results were validated against conventional displacement sensors. The RC frame exhibited millimeter-scale permanent displacements consistent with draw-wire measurements. In contrast, planter pods demonstrated configuration-dependent behavior, including up to 8 cm translational sliding and rotational responses reaching 13° under repeated excitation, whereas living wall panels remained stable. Notably, a 95% reduction in point cloud density reproduced global deformation patterns with an RMSE of 3.03 mm and quantified peak displacements with only ~2% deviation from full-resolution results. The findings demonstrate the capability of TLS-based monitoring to detect differential kinematic behavior of integrated VGSs, while highlighting the variability in performance of friction-based rooftop anchorage utilizing different robust planter pod fixing systems.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Vanian et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: