Key result
Semi-supervised cardiac segmentation matches fully supervised models using only ~10% labeled data.
Why the study?
Manual annotation of cardiac structures is labor-intensive and requires experts, resulting in limited labeled data for training segmentation models.
Does a novel semi-supervised cardiac segmentation framework improve segmentation accuracy in cardiac MRI scans with limited labeled data?
Does a novel semi-supervised cardiac segmentation framework improve segmentation accuracy in cardiac MRI scans with limited labeled data?
This semi-supervised deep learning framework enables accurate cardiac MRI segmentation using significantly less annotated data, potentially reducing the manual annotation burden for clinical deployment.
May ease annotation burden for cardiac MRI segmentation; extends semi-supervised methods but leaves clinical translation open.
Cardiac segmentation plays a crucial role in the diagnosis of cardiovascular diseases. However, the manual annotation of cardiac structures is a labor-intensive and time-consuming task that requires highly trained experts. Moreover, the availability of labeled data for training segmentation models is often limited due to the challenges associated with acquiring accurate annotations. To address this issue, we propose a novel semi-supervised cardiac segmentation framework that only needs a small set of labeled data with a larger pool of unlabeled data. We propose three strategies: dynamic pseudo-label threshold map, robust entropy minimization and contrastive consistency from the perspective of pseudo-labeling, entropy minimization and consistency regularization. Specifically, we propose a pixel-wise, class-wise and adaptive map to generate threshold maps and use the map for robust entropy minimization to reduce the noise from low-confidence samples. Besides, to utilize the unlabeled data sufficiently, we add contrastive consistency loss to implement regularization. Extensive experiments on the ACDC and MMWHS datasets demonstrate that our method achieves competitive performance compared to state-of-the-art approaches across various labeled data ratios. Ablation studies further validate the effectiveness and robustness of each component. Our framework shows strong potential for accurate diagnosis with limited annotations, and our code will be made publicly available.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mi et al. (2026) studied Cardiac segmentation (MRI) (n=170). Semi-supervised cardiac segmentation framework (dynamic pseudo-label threshold map, robust entropy minimization, contrastive consistency) vs. State-of-the-art semi-supervised methods and fully supervised models was evaluated on Dice Similarity Score (DSC) on ACDC dataset with 10% labeled data. The proposed semi-supervised cardiac segmentation framework achieved a Dice Similarity Score of 0.906 on the ACDC dataset using only 10% labeled data, demonstrating competitive performance with fully supervised models.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: