Analysis reveals multiple pathways to improve green innovation investment quality in heavily polluting firms, indicating policy implications.
Green innovation is central to industrial ecological transition, yet heavily polluting firms often exhibit low-quality green innovation investment. Grounded in the government–enterprise–research–intermediary Quadruple Helix innovation ecosystem framework, this study integrates Necessary Condition Analysis (NCA) and fuzzy set qualitative comparative analysis (fsQCA) to examine 66 publicly listed heavily polluting manufacturing firms in China. The results show that fiscal subsidies and environmental taxes are necessary but not sufficient conditions for achieving high-quality green innovation investment. Moreover, high-quality outcomes arise through three equifinal pathways: the Government–Intermediary Dual-Drive Model, the Government–Enterprise–Intermediary Co-Directional Model, and the Government–Enterprise Symbiotic Model. Six configurations lead to non-high-quality green innovation investment, which cluster into Resource-Scarcity and Regulatory-Constrained models. A favorable macro environment further strengthens high-quality outcomes. These findings clarify how policy instruments and multi-actor collaboration jointly shape green innovation investment quality and provide actionable implications for heavily polluting firms and policymakers seeking sustainable development.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: