Key result
Low-dose ticagrelor plus aspirin seeks non-inferiority to clopidogrel plus aspirin for preventing early neurological deterioration.
Why the study?
Ticagrelor combined with aspirin improves prognosis in high-risk non-disabling cerebrovascular events (HR-NICE) but carries a relatively high bleeding risk.
Does low-dose ticagrelor combined with aspirin prevent early neurological deterioration in patients with high-risk non-disabling cerebrovascular events compared to clopidogrel combined with aspirin?
RCT (n=240)
Open-label, blinded endpoints (PROBE)
Block randomization (1:1 ratio)
Yes
Does low-dose ticagrelor combined with aspirin prevent early neurological deterioration in patients with high-risk non-disabling cerebrovascular events compared to clopidogrel combined with aspirin?
This study protocol describes a randomized trial comparing low-dose ticagrelor plus aspirin versus clopidogrel plus aspirin for preventing early neurological deterioration in patients with high-risk non-disabling ischemic cerebrovascular events.
Should not yet change DAPT practice in high-risk non-disabling events; this RCT protocol extends evidence by testing low-dose ticagrelor versus clopidogrel for END prevention.
Early neurological deterioration (END) seriously endangers the clinical prognosis of high-risk non-disabling cerebrovascular events (HR-NICE), and strong antiplatelet therapy is an effective means of preventing the occurrence of END. Studies have confirmed that ticagrelor can avoid the low efficacy of clopidogrel in antiplatelet therapy caused by CYP2C19 gene dysfunction and that its combination with aspirin can improve the clinical prognosis of patients with HR-NICE. However, the overall risk of bleeding events is relatively high. In this protocol, we compared the prevention and safety of END in patients with HR-NICE using aspirin combined with low-dose ticagrelor and aspirin combined with clopidogrel. This multicenter, prospective, randomised, open-label, blinded endpoints (PROBE) clinical study intended to enrol 240 patients with HR-NICE who have not undergone reperfusion therapy for block randomization. Ticagrelor combined with aspirin group (120 cases): the patients were given 120 mg of ticagrelor and 100 mg of aspirin orally on the first day of enrollment, and from the next day onwards, ticagrelor 60 mg twice daily orally and aspirin 100 mg daily orally. The clopidogrel combined with aspirin group (120 cases) was administered 300 mg clopidogrel and 100 mg aspirin orally on the first day of enrollment, and starting from the next day, 75 mg clopidogrel and 100 mg aspirin were administered orally. After 21 days, all patients were changed to aspirin 100 mg daily orally. The main efficacy outcome is the early neurological deterioration within 7 days. Safety outcomes include any bleeding events and death. This non-inferiority trial will explore whether low-dose ticagrelor combined with aspirin is superior to clopidogrel combined with aspirin for the prevention of END in patients with HR–NICE patients. Ethics approval was obtained from the Ethics Committee of The First Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University (Number Project ID PJ-KS-KY-2023-03(X)). The research results will be published as a journal article. Chinese Clinical Trial Registry, ChiCTR2300068509. Registered on February 21, 2023. https://www.chictr.org.cn/.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wang et al. (2026) conducted an RCT in High-risk non-disabling ischemic cerebrovascular events (HR-NICE) (n=240). Low-dose ticagrelor combined with aspirin vs. Clopidogrel 300 mg and aspirin 100 mg on day 1, then clopidogrel 75 mg daily and aspirin 100 mg daily for 21 days, then aspirin 100 mg daily was evaluated on Early neurological deterioration within 7 days (new neurological deficits or an increase in the NIHSS score of ≥ 2 points). Low-dose ticagrelor combined with aspirin will be evaluated against clopidogrel combined with aspirin for the prevention of early neurological deterioration in a non-inferiority trial of 240 patients with high-risk non-disabling ischemic cerebrovascular events.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: