The paper explores dark matter and energy continuity and proposes a new Big Bang trigger mechanism.
Although further validation is required, the Cosmological Constant (Λ) Problem has been provisionally addressed within the current framework. Although further validation is required, the Fine-Structure Constant (α)Problem has been provisionally addressed within the current framework. Part II : terminal universe & the chorus trigger for the Big Bang Version 3.0 This paper has grown. What began as a single framework — FM, FE, and the cycling of ordinary matter — has expanded into a two-part structure. Part I remains as established: the reclassification of dark matter and dark energy, the resolution of the cosmological constant problem, and the trans-generational conservation of FM and FE. Part II is new: the terminal universe, the chorus trigger, and a proposed mechanism for the Big Bang itself. Not a singularity from nothing — a phase transition with a cause. v2.7 was skipped. The jump to v3.0 reflects what actually changed. As always — conceptual draft. Work in progress. Feedback welcome. Part I: Trans-Generational Continuity of Dark Matter and Dark Energy: Part II: Terminal Universe and the Big Bang Trigger Abstract Part IWe call it dark matter because we cannot see it, and dark energy becausewe do not understand it. Both names reflect our limitations rather than thenature of the things themselves. This paper proposes that what isconventionally termed dark matter is more precisely Fundamental Matter(FM) — the basic form of matter, interacting solely through gravity — andthat what is conventionally termed dark energy is more preciselyFundamental Energy (FE) — the basic expansive property of space,symmetric to gravity.Version 1.6 introduces a unifying thermodynamic observation: both FM andFE are inert with respect to entropy. FM exists at maximum entropy andtherefore does not change. FE has zero entropy as a uniform property ofspace. Ordinary matter, by contrast, undergoes entropic change: it cycles,complexifies, and gives rise to structure, chemistry, and life. This is thefundamental reason why FM and FE persist across cosmological transitionswhile ordinary matter does not.Version 1.6 also resolves the cosmological constant problem: vacuumenergy belongs to the matter sector (extractable via Hawking radiation)while FE is a property of space itself (not extractable by any black holemechanism). Their conflation generated the 10¹²² discrepancy. Onceseparated, the problem dissolves. Furthermore, baryonic asymmetry isproposed as a structural consequence of the inherited inhomogeneous FMdistribution — a mechanism complementary to and consistent with recentwork by Ambrosone et al. (2022) on black-hole-mediated baryogenesis.Version 2.0 demonstrates that the 10¹²² discrepancy is not a fine-tuningproblem — it is a boundary problem. Pauli (1933) observed that vacuumzero-point energy does not gravitationally interact; Cohen, Kaplan & Nelson(1999) formalized the boundary condition; this model provides the physical mechanism via FM’s Equivalent Exchange Principle. Once the boundary isapplied, the CKN condition recovers a vacuum energy density of ∼10⁻⁹ J/m³— within the same order of magnitude as the observed FE density of 5.36 ×10⁻¹⁰ J/m³ (Planck 2018). A discrepancy of 10¹²² orders reduces to within asingle order. Version 2.1 identifies electromagnetically inert particles —neutrinos and gravitons — as observationally accessible proxies for FMbehaviour at the event horizon, providing indirect evidence for theEquivalent Exchange Principle. Version 2.6 proposes that the fine structureconstant α emerges from the FM/FE energy inventory, conserved acrosscosmological generations by entropic invariance — establishing α as astructural consequence of this universe’s composition, not a fine-tunedcoincidence. Part II Part I established that Fundamental Matter (FM) and Fundamental Energy(FE) persist across cosmological generations while ordinary matter (OM)cycles through black holes via Hawking radiation. Part II extends thisframework to the terminal state of the universe. We propose that the finaluniverse — in which all OM has been converted to FM and only a singleclass of black holes remains — satisfies two distinct trigger conditions thattogether initiate a new Big Bang: a geometric condition, in which externalFE volume exceeds internal volume, and a thermodynamic condition, inwhich black hole entropy converges on horizon entropy. These twoconditions constitute a chorus trigger: they need not arrive simultaneously,but both must be met. We further propose that our universe is the firstHawking-universe generation, and derive that OM depletion reachescompletion within approximately 28 generational cycles under physicallymotivated assumptions. The framework requires no inflaton field, no fine-tuning, and no appeal to structures beyond FM, FE, and classicalthermodynamics.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jaehwa Hong (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: