This research evaluates Mexidol's effectiveness in reducing neurological deficits in rats with hemorrhagic stroke, implying potential therapeutic benefits.
Objective. To comprehensively evaluate the neuroprotective potential of Mexidol following systemic administration in various dosage forms in a model of hemorrhagic stroke. Material and methods. The study was performed on 130 outbred male rats, weighing 180—200 g and aged 7—8 weeks. All animals were divided into 3 series: Series 1 — intravenous administration of Mexidol at doses of 50 and 100 mg/kg; Series 2 — intramuscular administration at doses of 50 and 100 mg/kg; Series 3 — intragastric administration at doses of 50, 100, and 200 mg/kg. Acute hemorrhagic stroke was modeled by administering autologous blood at a volume of 0.05 ml/kg body weight into the region of the internal capsule of the right hemisphere. Mexidol administration was initiated 30 minutes after modeling acute focal stroke. Twenty-four hours after the surgery, the severity of neurological deficit was assessed using the McGraw Stroke-Index Scale modified by I.V. Gannushkina. Subsequently, the animals were euthanized, the brain was isolated, fixed in formalin, and tomography was performed. Results. Intravenous administration of Mexidol at a dose of 100 mg/kg led to a statistically significant reduction in the severity of clinical symptoms 24 hours after surgery compared to control animals. Intramuscular administration produced a similar effect at doses of 50 and 100 mg/kg, while intragastric administration did so at doses of 100 mg/kg and 200 mg/kg. Intravenous and intramuscular administration of Mexidol at doses of 50 and 100 mg/kg did not affect the size of the brain lesion in rats, whereas intragastric administration of Mexidol at a dose of 200 mg/kg led to its reduction. Conclusion. The obtained results indicate that, in cases of small intracranial hematomas (e.g., those remaining after surgical removal of the initial hematoma), Mexidol exerts a pronounced neuroprotective effect.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Shchulkin et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: