Establishes a bijection linking primitive Pythagorean triples to metallic means, indicating deep mathematical connections.
**Version 1 (29 April 2026)** This paper establishes a canonical, complete, and bijective correspondence between the family of primitive Pythagorean triples and the classical metallic means (including the golden ratio φ = δ₁). **Main results**:- **Canonical Bijection Theorem**: For every integer n ≥ 5 there exists a unique primitive Pythagorean triple (a, b, c) with c − b ∈ {1, 2, 8} such that the n-th metallic mean δₙ = cot(θ/4), where θ is the smaller acute angle of the triple.- All admissible n are explicitly constructed and classified into the Pythagoras, Plato, and Socrates families via the Euclid parametrization and the 1-2-8 rule.- Unified trigonometric representation valid across all three families: δₙ = cot(arctan(4n/(n² − 4))/4).- Two independent constructions showing that every Fermat-family triple (b − a = 1) generates metallic means both from its integer sides and from the difference of its acute angles.- Hierarchical structure: when primitive triples are composed via the Brahmagupta–Fibonacci identity, configurations of two, three, and four triples generate the golden ratio φ, its cube φ³ = δ₄, and higher metallic means through cotangent normalisation of aggregated acute angles. The algebraic mechanism is interpreted via Möbius transformations on cotangent values and via Gaussian-integer multiplication in ℤ[i], confirming that the emergence of quadratic irrationals from rational triangle data is structurally inevitable. This standalone preprint complements the author’s unified Deca-Metallic Ratios manuscript (which incorporates these geometric results into the base-10 Deca-Metallic framework). **Keywords**: Golden ratio, metallic means, primitive Pythagorean triples, cotangent normalisation, Brahmagupta–Fibonacci identity, Euclid parametrization, angle aggregation, Möbius transformations, Gaussian integers, quadratic irrationals.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chetansing Rajput (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: