Computational analysis predicts rescuability of GPCR variants, suggesting faster identification of therapies.
Pharmacological chaperones (PCs) rescue the surface expression of destabilizedprotein variants by binding and stabilizing the target protein. This mechanismaffords a promising therapeutic strategy for rare diseases caused by proteinmisfolding. Recent deep mutational scanning (DMS) experiments have mapped PCrescue across entire mutational landscapes. Yet, to our knowledge, no DMS-scalecomputational predictor benchmarked on rescue landscapes exists. Here, we developa machine learning approach to predict PC rescuability of missense variants using acompact, transferable feature set. We used 2,133 folding/trafficking-defective V2Rvariants treated with tolvaptan as a training benchmark. Our Random Forestclassifier integrates pathogenicity scores, thermodynamic stability forecasts, andbaseline expression severity. It achieves an AUROC of 0.751 (95% CI: 0.730–0.772),with no evidence of positional information leakage (leave-positions-out AUROC:0.745). Mechanistic analysis shows two classes of non-rescued variants: thosedisrupting the drug-binding site (moderate destabilization, small hydrophobicitychanges), and those with severe fold disruption exceeding the chaperone's stabilizingcapacity. A frozen V2R-trained model using four transferable features(AlphaMissense score, baseline expression, hydrophobicity change, and ESM1blanguage model score) transferred to Rhodopsin, a different GPCR treated with adifferent chaperone (YC-001), measured by a different assay. It achieved an AUROCof 0.843 (95% CI: 0.816–0.868; permutation p < 0.001). Results were robust acrossclassification thresholds (AUROC range: 0.783–0.843). Our findings show thatrescuability is partially predictable from a compact transferable feature setcombining computational and assay-derived information, and is mechanisticallydistinct from pathogenicity. This suggests computational pre-screening couldaccelerate identification of PC-responsive variants for rare disease therapeutics.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Po‐Chun Chen (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: