Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This comparative study evaluates deep learning methods for detecting grapevine fanleaf virus, suggesting efficient approaches for viticulture.
Grapevine fanleaf virus (GFLV) poses a significant phytopathological threat to global viticulture, demanding the development of rapid and accurate detection methodologies to mitigate economic losses. In this study, four deep learning-based object detection architectures were implemented and comparatively evaluated, ROBOFLOW 3.0 (Fast), YOLO-NAS (Accurate and Medium), YOLOv11 (Fast), and the latest YOLOv12 (Fast), for the automated identification of GFLV symptoms on grapevine leaves. A custom dataset comprising high-resolution images captured under diverse vineyard conditions was curated and meticulously annotated. YOLO models were trained on 100-350 epochs. Model performance was assessed using metrics such as Precision, Recall, Mean average precision at Intersection over Union (IoU)=0.5 (mAP@50), Mean average precision across IoU thresholds (mAP@50–95), and F1 score. Among the evaluated models, YOLOv11 Fast achieved the highest mAP@50 value (93.4%) and an F1 score of 88.3%. In comparison, ROBOFLOW 3.0 Fast reached a mAP@50 of 89.4% and an F1 score of 86%, YOLO-NAS Accurate achieved mAP 92.4% and F1 85.2%, and YOLO-NAS Medium obtained 91.9% and 85.3%, respectively. The latest version YOLOv12 Fast yielded mAP@50 91.3% and F1 86.5%. These results highlight the potential of next-generation YOLO architectures for high-throughput, real-time GFLV detection, offering a scalable and efficient solution for precision viticulture and integrated disease management.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
ÖZTÜRK et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: