Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Descriptive research examines irrigation project performance in Kenya, suggesting improved funding could enhance outcomes.
This study examines the influence of monitoring and evaluation (M&E) practices on irrigation project performance in Tharaka-Nithi County, Kenya, focusing on baseline surveys, stakeholder participation, budgetary allocation, and capacity building. Employing a descriptive and explanatory research design, data were collected from 126 respondents across three major irrigation schemes using structured questionnaires. Multiple regression analysis revealed that these M&E practices collectively account for 24.5% of the variance in project performance (R² = 0.245, p < 0.001). Budgetary allocation emerged as the most significant predictor (β = 0.807, p < 0.001), demonstrating a strong positive correlation with project success. Stakeholder participation showed marginal significance (β = 0.135, p = 0.053), while baseline surveys exhibited minimal impact. Capacity building presented a complex relationship requiring further investigation, showing a positive bivariate correlation but a negative regression coefficient. The findings emphasise the critical importance of adequate M&E funding and integrated frameworks for achieving sustainable irrigation outcomes and addressing Kenya\\\'s persistent food security challenges in semi-arid regions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mbae et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: