PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 8, 2026Bioengineering0 citationsOpen Access

In Vitro Biofilm Formation on 3D-Printed, Milled, and Conventionally Manufactured Denture Base Resins

MHMichael del HougneUniversity of WürzburgAMAlexander MitzscherlingUniversity of WürzburgAEAndrea EwaldUniversity of Würzburg

Key Points

  • This study aims to assess how different manufacturing techniques affect biofilm formation on denture base materials.
  • Investigated biofilm formation by Streptococcus mutans and Streptococcus sanguinis.
  • Fabricated disc-shaped specimens from 3D-printed, milled, and conventionally processed materials.
  • Used crystal violet staining for biofilm assessment over a 21-day incubation.
  • Evaluated surface characteristics with scanning electron microscopy.
  • S. mutans showed significant material-dependent differences at selected time points, with low overall biofilm accumulation.
  • S. sanguinis formed significantly more biofilm than S. mutans across all materials and time points.
  • Milled PMMA generally displayed lower biofilm accumulation compared to additive and conventional methods.

Abstract

Biofilm formation on denture base materials may contribute to oral diseases such as denture stomatitis and therefore represents an important factor in prosthodontic treatment. This in vitro study investigated biofilm formation on dental prosthetic materials manufactured by additive, subtractive, and conventional techniques. Disc-shaped specimens were fabricated from 3D-printed Denture Base Resin (Formlabs), milled Lucitone Digital Fit (Dentsply Sirona), and conventionally processed cold-polymerized PALAPress (Kulzer). Biofilm formation by Streptococcus mutans and Streptococcus sanguinis was assessed separately over a 21-day incubation period using crystal violet staining and photometric determination of optical density at eight predefined time points. Surface characteristics before and after microbial colonization were qualitatively evaluated by scanning electron microscopy. For S. mutans, significant material-dependent differences were observed only at selected time points, while overall biofilm accumulation remained low. In contrast, S. sanguinis exhibited pronounced and repeated differences, with milled PMMA generally showing lower biofilm accumulation compared with additively manufactured and conventionally processed materials. Overall, S. sanguinis formed significantly more biofilm than S. mutans across all materials and time points. These findings indicate that both manufacturing technique and bacterial species influence biofilm formation on denture base materials.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Hougne et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69d5f13674eaea4b11a7abb1https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering13040424
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper