Key result
High-intensity functional training improves cardiometabolic health, vascular function, and VO2max versus control.
Why the study?
The study was conducted to evaluate the potential beneficial effect and efficacy of two distinct high-intensity functional training protocols on cardio-respiratory fitness and functional movement performance in obese adolescents.
Does a 12-week high-intensity functional training (HIFT) protocol, alone or combined with basketball, improve cardio-respiratory fitness, body composition, vascular function, and functional movement performance in obese adolescents compared to no structured training?
RCT (n=33)
1:1:1 randomization into HB (n=11), HIFT (n=11), and control (n=11) groups
No
Does a 12-week high-intensity functional training (HIFT) protocol, alone or combined with basketball, improve cardio-respiratory fitness, body composition, vascular function, and functional movement performance in obese adolescents compared to no structured training?
High-intensity functional training, both alone and combined with basketball, significantly improves body composition, vascular endothelial function, blood pressure, autonomic balance, and cardiorespiratory fitness in obese adolescents over 12 weeks.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
HIFT improves CV and fitness markers in obese adolescents; extends RCT evidence for functional training in youth.
Purpose: The purpose of the current study was to evaluate the potential beneficial effect and efficacy of two distinct high-intensity functional training (HIFT) protocols on cardio-respiratory fitness and functional movement performance in obese adolescents. Methods: Thirty-three obese adolescents were randomly divided into the HIFT combined with basketball group (HB, n = 11), the HIFT group ( n = 11) and the control group (no structured training, n = 11), with a 12-week intervention (3 sessions/week, 45 min/training session). Body composition analysis, pulse wave velocity (PWV), flow-mediated dilation (FMD) measurement, heart rate variability (HRV) assessment, and maximum oxygen consumption (VO 2 max) test, and functional movement performance test (vertec jump, sitting anterior flexion, T-run, 300-yard shuttle run, Y-balance) were employed to evaluate their fitness. Results: Both interventions significantly reduced body weight, BMI, and fat mass, while increasing water content. Additionally, HIFT could increase the inorganic salt content, protein content, and muscle mass, while decreased BMIz significantly. In terms of cardiovascular parameters, both interventions substantially reduced blood pressure. However, HIFT could decrease the cfPWV. Additionally, both interventions significantly decreased the AIx and AIx@HR75, while improving SEVR and FMD. For HRV indices, both interventions decreased the HR, increased the time domain indices (RMSSD, PNN50, SDNN and NN50) and TP of obese adolescents, while also elevating HF and reduced LF/HF ratio compared to the control group. We also found that both interventions could boost VO 2 max and functional movement performance. Conclusions: This study demonstrated HB and HIFT exerted comparable efficacy in improving the body composition parameters, cardiovascular function, and functional movement performance in obese adolescents, possibly by mitigating arterial stiffness, balancing autonomic activity, enhancing respiratory fitness and optimizing hemodynamics.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lin et al. (2026) conducted an RCT in Adolescent obesity (n=33). High-intensity functional training (HIFT) alone or combined with basketball (HB) vs. Control group maintaining regular daily life behaviors with no structured training was evaluated on Cardio-respiratory fitness (VO2max), body composition, cardiovascular function (blood pressure, PWV, FMD, HRV), and functional movement performance (p=<0.05). High-intensity functional training with or without basketball over 12 weeks significantly reduced body weight, fat mass, and blood pressure while improving FMD, HRV, VO2max, and movement performance vs control (p<0.05).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: