Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Both CFP and FAF imaging are reliable for measuring GA area. Interobserver agreement was slightly higher for FAF images. Although the high agreement between modalities suggests that either would be appropriate for measuring GA area, using both may be the best approach for following GA progression.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Khanifar et al. (2012) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: