Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Abstract Research has demonstrated how membership in more democratic regional intergovernmental organizations (ROs) can strengthen the prospects for democracy. However, a significant number of ROs are dominated by autocratic members who have quite different preferences: to limit democratic contagion and consolidate authoritarian rule against democratic challengers. We outline a menu of mechanisms through which ROs with authoritarian memberships might have pernicious effects on the prospects for democratic rule. We use cross-national quantitative analyses to demonstrate that membership in more deeply authoritarian international organizations is associated with autocratization. We supplement the quantitative results with an analysis of twenty-nine of the most authoritarian ROs and illustrative case studies. The multi-method approach strengthens inference by showing that authoritarian international organizations do in fact engage in behaviors inimical to democratic rule.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Christina Cottiero
Stephan Haggard
University of California, San Diego
International Studies Quarterly
University of California, San Diego
University of Utah
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Cottiero et al. (Tue,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/69d6b2aae328128020aa805f — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/isq/sqad031