Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Extant research emphasizes that corporate governance (CG) significantly influences environmental, social, and governance (ESG) outcomes. This paper undertakes a content analysis and reviews 91 academic articles published in 41 journals over the past 14 years (2010-2023). We examine the role of CG in ESG outcomes by focusing on CG themes, ESG indicators, theories, countries, and empirical methodologies used to address endogeneity. The findings show that several factors collectively impact ESG outcomes positively. Such factors include female directors, institutional investors, independent directors, CEO characteristics, directors' compensation, and sustainability committees. Relatedly, the findings also suggest that family ownership may potentially exert a detrimental effect on ESG performance. Despite the burgeoning evidence on CG and ESG outcomes, we highlight several understudied areas, such as directors' ESG expertise in specific ESG-related sectors and CEO tenure. Furthermore, we call for more research focusing on non-financial firms, particularly in European countries. Given the current studies' reliance on archival methodologies, we encourage future research to adopt diverse approaches, such as qualitative and mixed research methods. Finally, we discuss several research avenues, identify gaps in the literature, and outline a future research agenda. • Delivers an exhaustive, framework-oriented literature review on corporate governance and ESG. • The study includes 91 papers from 2010 to 2023, encompassing 145 corporate governance attributes. • The literature also examines ESG indicators, underlying theories, geographic scope, and methodologies to mitigate endogeneity.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Buchetti et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: