PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 1, 2011Perspectives in Clinical Research1,985 citationsOpen Access

Intention-to-treat concept: A review

View Full Paper
SGSandeep Kumar GuptaM.V. Hospital and Research Centre

Key Points

  • The review discusses the importance and application of intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis in randomized controlled trials.
  • Review of existing literature on ITT analysis
  • Focus on issues like noncompliance and missing outcomes
  • Evaluation of treatment effect estimates using ITT approach.
  • ITT analysis includes all randomized subjects regardless of compliance
  • It helps maintain balance in prognostic factors from original randomization
  • Complete outcome data improves the accuracy of ITT application.

Abstract

Randomized controlled trials often suffer from two major complications, i.e., noncompliance and missing outcomes. One potential solution to this problem is a statistical concept called intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis. ITT analysis includes every subject who is randomized according to randomized treatment assignment. It ignores noncompliance, protocol deviations, withdrawal, and anything that happens after randomization. ITT analysis maintains prognostic balance generated from the original random treatment allocation. In ITT analysis, estimate of treatment effect is generally conservative. A better application of the ITT approach is possible if complete outcome data are available for all randomized subjects. Per-protocol population is defined as a subset of the ITT population who completed the study without any major protocol violations.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Sandeep Kumar Gupta (2011) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69d6fb9ce328128020aa89ddhttps://doi.org/10.4103/2229-3485.83221
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper