This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
Much behavioral rescarch involves comparing the central tendencies of different groups, or of the same subjects under different conditions, and the usual analysis is some form of mean comparison. This article suggests that an ordinal statistic, d, is often more appropriate. d compares the number of times a score from one group or condition is higher than one from the other, compared with the reverse. Compared to mean comparisons, d is more robust and equally or more powerful; it is invariant under transformation; and it often conforms more closely to the experimenter's research hypothesis. It is suggested that inferences from d be based on sample estimates of its variance rather than on the more traditional assumption of identical distributions
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Norman Cliff (1993) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: