PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
September 5, 2012Journal of Management670 citations

Change Readiness

View Full Paper
ARAlannah E. RaffertyNJNerina L. JimmiesonAAAchilles A. Armenakis

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

The authors conducted a theoretical review of the change readiness literature and identified two major limitations with this work. First, while there is substantial agreement about the key cognitions that underlie change readiness, researchers have not examined the affective element of this attitude. Second, researchers have not adopted a multilevel perspective when considering change readiness. The authors address these limitations and argue that it is important to incorporate affect into definitions of the change readiness construct and also when measuring this construct. They then develop a multilevel framework that identifies the antecedents and consequences of individual, work group, and organizational change readiness. Next, the authors outline the theoretical processes that lead to the development of individual and collective change readiness. They then review theoretical and empirical evidence to identify the antecedents of change readiness at the three levels of analysis. Finally, the authors identify a number of suggestions to guide future research seeking to adopt a multilevel approach to change readiness.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Rafferty et al. (2012) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69d71f7e3f906f6a06bef221https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206312457417
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Psychological Safety and Learning Behavior in Work Teams1999 · 11,497 citations
  2. 2Breaking the Code of Change2000 · 473 citations
  3. 3Facilitating Acceptance of Organizational Change: The Importance of Self‐Determination12000 · 258 citations
  4. 4EVOLVING INTERPRETATIONS AS A CHANGE UNFOLDS: HOW MANAGERS CONSTRUE KEY ORGANIZATIONAL EVENTS.1990 · 1,103 citations
  5. 5Why Are Perceptions of Change in the “Eye of the Beholder”?2009 · 42 citations