Chemical, X-ray, electron optical, and infrared analyses have been made on twenty antigorites form the Nishisonogi and Sasaguri areas, northern Kyushu, Japan, along with two antigorites from other localities. The indexed X-ray powder patterns give various supercell A parameters (A = 35.4–47.2Å) as well as varying subcell dimensions (a = 5.42–5.46, b = 9.24–9.26, c = 7.24–7.28Å, (β = 91.3–91.7°). When the ratio of A⁄a is represented by M (M = 6.5–8.7), the electron diffraction patterns can be classified into M = n (n is integer), M = (2n + 1)/2, and M ≠n⁄2 types. The minerals with these different types of M aggregate to form common antigorite specimens. The well-known A = 43Å antigorite belongs to the M = n type. Single crystal X-ray and electron diffraction patterns indicate that the true superstructure periodicity along the X axis of the antigorites giving M = (2n + 1)/2 type patterns, which may contain odd-numbered octahedra in the one alternating-wave, is 2A (corresponding to two waves) and the space lattice is C-centered. This lattice seems to give more reasonable structures at the inversion points of the alternating-waves than hitherto predicted (Kunze, 1961). The M ≠n⁄2 type patterns may be caused by coherent domains with different A parameters of the former two types. The structural formula of antigorite can be given by Mg6Si4(1 + 1/2M)O10(1+1/2M)(OH)8-2M. Octahedral Mg is substituted by Fe2+, and Al or trivalent cations substitute for both the tetrahedral and octahedral cations, although the trivalent cations may be contained more in the octahedral positions for most materials. Larger Fe2+ content (FeO 5.5% in max.) tends to bring larger a and b, but smaller c and M(A) parameters. The small c is also produced by relatively large Al contents (Al2O3 4.1% in max.), which supports the presence of tetrahedral Al together with the infrared 3570 cm−1 band. The main OH band at 3685–3674 cm−1 tends to decrease in frequency with increasing Fe content and decreasing M parameter. The correlations of the Fe contents to the a and M parameters and to the main OH band are somewhat different between the Nishisonogi and Sasaguri antigorites, which are discussed in relation to their formation conditions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Uehara et al. (1985) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched one closely related paper. Consider it for comparative context: