Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Both types of implants showed good results without significant differences in long-term follow up, even though we expected the higher recurrent enophthalmos rate in patients with absorbable plate. In conclusion, both types seem to be equally effective and safe for orbital wall reconstruction. In particular, both implant types significantly improve the incidence of enophthalmos in cases of inferior orbital wall fractures.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Baek et al. (2014) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: