Why the study?
What is the prevalence and clinical outcome of effusive constrictive pericarditis?
What is the prevalence and clinical outcome of effusive constrictive pericarditis?
Effusive constrictive pericarditis has a relatively low prevalence in non-tuberculous pericarditis but is associated with high rates of pericardiectomy and substantial mortality.
ECP's high pericardiectomy and mortality rates warrant clinical vigilance in pericarditis; extends pooled estimates for outcomes research.
There is sparse information on the epidemiology of effusive constrictive pericarditis (ECP). The objective of this article was to review and summarise the literature on the prevalence and outcome of ECP, and identify gaps for further research. The prevalence of ECP ranged from 2.4 to 14.8%, with a weighted average of 4.5% [95% confidence interval (CI) 2.2-7.5%]. Sixty-five per cent (95% CI: 43-82%) of patients required pericardiectomy regardless of the aetiology. The combined death rate across the studies was 22% (95(CI: 4-50%). The prevalence of ECP is low in non-tuberculous pericarditis, while pericardiectomy rates are high and mortality is variable. In this review, of 10 patients identified with tuberculous ECP, only one presumed case had a definite diagnosis of ECP. Appropriate studies are needed to determine the epidemiology of ECP in tuberculous pericarditis, which is one of the leading causes of pericardial disease in the world.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ntsekhe et al. (2012) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: