PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 1, 1989Circulation470 citations

Differentiation of constrictive pericarditis and restrictive cardiomyopathy by Doppler echocardiography.

View Full Paper
LHL K HatleCAC. P. AppletonRPRichard L. Popp

Structured PICO

Can Doppler echocardiography differentiate between constrictive pericarditis and restrictive cardiomyopathy based on respiratory changes in transvalvular flow velocities?

P
Population
12 patients with restrictive cardiomyopathy, 7 patients with constrictive pericarditis, and 20 healthy adult controls (total n=39).
I
Intervention
Doppler echocardiography (ultrasound recordings of mitral, tricuspid, aortic, and pulmonary flow velocities, and their variation with respiration)
C
Comparator
Comparison between restrictive cardiomyopathy, constrictive pericarditis, and healthy controls
O
Outcome
Respiratory changes in transvalvular flow velocities (left ventricular isovolumic relaxation time, early mitral and tricuspid flow velocities, and deceleration time)surrogate

Doppler echocardiography can effectively differentiate constrictive pericarditis from restrictive cardiomyopathy by assessing respiratory variations in transvalvular flow velocities.

Abstract

Doppler ultrasound recordings of mitral, tricuspid, aortic, and pulmonary flow velocities, and their variation with respiration, were recorded in 12 patients with a restrictive cardiomyopathy and seven patients with constrictive pericarditis. Twenty healthy adults served as controls. The patients with constrictive pericarditis showed marked changes in left ventricular isovolumic relaxation time and in early mitral and tricuspid flow velocities at the onset of inspiration and expiration. These changes disappeared after pericardiectomy and were not seen in patients with restrictive cardiomyopathy or in normal subjects. The deceleration time of early mitral and tricuspid flow velocity was shorter than normal in both groups, indicating an early cessation of ventricular filling, but only patients with restrictive cardiomyopathy showed a further shortening of the tricuspid deceleration time with inspiration. Diastolic mitral and tricuspid regurgitation was also more common in the patients with restrictive cardiomyopathy. These results suggest that patients with constrictive pericarditis and restrictive cardiomyopathy can be differentiated by comparing respiratory changes in transvalvular flow velocities. In addition, although baseline hemodynamics in the two groups were similar, characteristic changes were seen with respiration that suggest differentiation of these disease states may also be possible from hemodynamic data.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Hatle et al. (1989) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69d7267d8a0e2c5879bef9f5https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.79.2.357
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper