Why the study?
Do different adjuvanted FMD vaccines protect cattle and pigs against virulent virus challenge?
Do different adjuvanted FMD vaccines protect cattle and pigs against virulent virus challenge?
AS and ISA 206B adjuvanted FMD vaccines provide effective protection and lasting antibody responses against SAT serotypes in cattle and pigs.
May guide adjuvant selection for durable FMD vaccines in cattle; leaves open field efficacy and pig translation.
Foot-and-mouth disease (FMD) is an economically important disease of cloven-hoofed animals that is primarily controlled by vaccination of susceptible animals and movement restrictions for animals and animal-derived products in South Africa. Vaccination using aluminium hydroxide gel-saponin (AS) adjuvanted vaccines containing the South African Territories (SAT) serotypes has been shown to be effective both in ensuring that disease does not spread from the endemic to the free zone and in controlling outbreaks in the free zone. Various vaccine formulations containing antigens derived from the SAT serotypes were tested in cattle that were challenged 1 year later. Both the AS and ISA 206B vaccines adjuvanted with saponin protected cattle against virulent virus challenge. The oil-based ISA 206B-adjuvanted vaccine with and without stimulators was evaluated in a field trial and both elicited antibody responses that lasted for 1 year. Furthermore, the ISA 206 adjuvanted FMD vaccine protected groups of cattle against homologous virus challenge at very low payloads, while pigs vaccinated with an emergency ISA 206B-based FMD vaccine containing the SAT 1 vaccine strains were protected against the heterologous SAT 1 outbreak strain.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cloete et al. (2008) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: