Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
An improved three-regime (3R) O₃ attribution technique for O₃ source apportionment in regional chemical transport models is developed to divide the entire range of VOC-NO x-O₃ formation sensitivity to VOC-limited, transition, and NO x-limited regimes based on the value of a regime indicator R. The threshold R values to mark the start ( Rts) and end ( Rte) of the transition regime are defined at the point where O₃-NO x sensitivity turns from negative to positive and where O₃-NO x sensitivity is ten times higher than O₃-VOC sensitivity, respectively. Rts and Rte are determined using NO x and VOC sensitivity simulations in a box model with a modified SAPRC-11 mechanism. For the widely used indicator ration R = ( PH2O2 + PROOH)/ PHNO3, which is based on the production rates of H₂O₂, HNO₃ and organic hydroperoxides (ROOH), the recommended Rts and Rte values are 0.047 and 5.142, respectively. Parameterized attribution functions, depending only on the values of R, are developed to apportion modeled in situ O₃ formation in the transition regime to NO x and VOCs. The new 3R and the traditional two-regime (2R) schemes are incorporated into the Community Multiscale Air Quality (CMAQ) model to quantify NO x and VOC contributions to regional O₃ concentrations in China in August 2013. The 3R approach predicts approximately 5-10 ppb and up to 15 ppb higher NO x contributions to 8 h O₃ in in the North China Plain, the Yangtze River Delta and the Pearl River Delta than the 2R approach. The big differences in O₃ attribution between 2R and 3R can have significant policy implications for air pollution emission controls.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wang et al. (2018) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: