PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
September 1, 2005American Psychologist3,073 citations

The gender similarities hypothesis.

View Full Paper
JHJanet Shibley Hyde

Key Points

  • To evaluate whether psychological empirical evidence supports a model of widespread gender differences or the gender similarities hypothesis.
  • Synthesized findings from a comprehensive review of 46 meta-analyses examining psychological gender comparisons.
  • Evaluated the impact of developmental age and measurement context on the magnitude of observed gender differences.
  • Demonstrated that males and females are similar across most psychological variables, strongly supporting the gender similarities hypothesis over the differences model.
  • Observed that the magnitude of gender differences fluctuates substantially across different age groups and testing contexts.
  • Identified substantial real-world costs associated with overinflated claims of gender differences, particularly in workplace dynamics and personal relationships.

Abstract

The differences model, which argues that males and females are vastly different psychologically, dominates the popular media. Here, the author advances a very different view, the gender similarities hypothesis, which holds that males and females are similar on most, but not all, psychological variables. Results from a review of 46 meta-analyses support the gender similarities hypothesis. Gender differences can vary substantially in magnitude at different ages and depend on the context in which measurement occurs. Overinflated claims of gender differences carry substantial costs in areas such as the workplace and relationships.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Janet Shibley Hyde (2005) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69d73b995f9a1dad5348f8d4https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066x.60.6.581
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper