Amnesia for an offence had been misdiagnosed, and the use of repeated abreaction interviews had further confused both the appellant and the original court. At the Appeal Court, the advice was that the man had experienced a form of source amnesia which resulted in an unreliable confession.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gudjónsson et al. (1999) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: