This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
The efficient purification of CH 4 from multicomponent C 3 H 8 /C 2 H 6 /CH 4 natural gas mixture under humid conditions is critical for optimizing the energy efficiency and safety of CH 4 utilization, however, developing energy‐efficient separation technologies remains an urgent priority. In this work, the efficient separation of high purity CH 4 (≥99.99%) from natural gas mixture is reported via adsorptive separation using a microporous metal–organic frameworks (MOFs) BUT‐315, which features high‐density C 3 H 8 /C 2 H 6 nano‐traps. BUT‐315 demonstrates outstanding separation selectivity for both C 3 H 8 /CH 4 (545.8) and C 2 H 6 /CH 4 (54.9), benefiting from its much higher C 3 H 8 /C 2 H 6 affinity over CH 4 as indicated by the density functional theory (DFT) calculation. Notably, BUT‐315 achieves the highest separation potential (△Q) (26.54 mmol g −1 ) for C 2 H 6 /CH 4 mixture of 10:85 ratio among reported benchmark adsorbents, ascribed to its unprecedented C 2 H 6 uptake at 0.1 bar along with its superior C 2 H 6 /CH 4 selectivity. Besides, BUT‐315 also demonstrates exceptional CH 4 productivity (10.76 mmol g −1 ) during the dynamic breakthrough experiment of ternary (C 3 H 8 /C 2 H 6 /CH 4 = 5/10/85) gas mixture. Furthermore, its excellent separation performance can well maintain at least 10 adsorption–desorption cycles, even under the introduction of humidity (RH = 70%), which is a consequence of BUT‐315′s high C 2 H 6 /H 2 O (28.8) and C 3 H 8 /H 2 O (14.8) kinetic selectivity.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhao et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: