Aim Grasses (Poaceae) are found in all major habitats of Madagascar and have a particular importance in C 4 grasslands, whose origins are controversial. We aimed to estimate the number, age and origins of endemic grass lineages in the Madagascar region, and to compare the diversification of C 3 and C 4 taxa. Location Madagascar and the surrounding Indian Ocean islands, integrated within a global dataset. Methods We estimated 11 time‐calibrated molecular phylogenies including 73% of Madagascar's known grass flora (65% of endemics), using two calibration scenarios. Integrating the available sequences from worldwide grass species, a total of 1928 accessions were analysed. We tested range evolution models, estimated ancestral ranges, and compared the patterns of lineage accumulation between endemic C 3 and C 4 grasses. Results We recovered 69 lineages endemic to or with an estimated origin in the Madagascar region, 25 of them C 3 and 44 C 4 . Range evolution analysis suggests widespread distance‐scaling of dispersal and strongest historical links to Africa. Extant grass diversity largely accumulated since the Miocene, with parallel increases in C 3 and C 4 taxa. Two large C 3 groups in the “Forest shade clade” (Paniceae: Boivinellinae) and the bamboos (subtribe Hickeliinae) have an estimated origin in the Madagascar region. Divergences and crown ages of endemic C 4 lineages largely coincide with the Miocene grassland expansion. Main conclusions Madagascar's extant grass flora is the result of multiple overseas dispersals, predominantly from Africa, and diversified from the Miocene onwards. C 3 grasses are characterized by two large presumed in situ radiations of shade grasses in the Paniceae and bamboos. Endemic C 4 lineages result from twice as many immigration events, resulting in smaller clades. Ages of C 4 lineages are consistent with a Pliocene or Late Miocene origin of grasslands in Madagascar, but estimating the nature and expanse of such early grasslands will require further research.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hackel et al. (2018) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: