Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The part-load fuel consumption potential of unthrottled engine operation using variable valve actuation is evaluated for a single-cylinder version of the GM 3.4 L DOHC engine. The investigation focuses on evaluating the practical range of the early-intake-valve closing (EIVC) variable valve actuation strategy, which includes intake-valve-opening positions ranging from 360 to 420 crank-angle degrees ATDC, intake-valve durations ranging from 54 to 226 crank-angle degrees, and peak intake-valve lifts ranging from 0.75 to 4.5 mm. In addition to the experimental investigation, a one-dimensional simulation evaluation is completed to examine the potential of enhanced in-cylinder charge motion when implementing variable-valve actuation. A 7 % fuel consumption improvement is achieved for unthrottled engine operation when implementing the EIVC variable valve actuation strategy. This has been demonstrated at a part-load engine operating condition of 1300 rpm and 330 kPa net-mean-effective-pressure (NMEP) through the optimization of the intake-valve lift, duration, and timing while maintaining the conventional exhaust valve event. Along with this fuel consumption improvement, the engine-out HC emission level was 25 % higher and the engine-out NOx emission level was 25 % lower for unthrottled engine operation. Higher intake-valve velocities and in-cylinder charge motion could be achieved for unthrottled engine operation when using variable valve actuation; however, no significant combustion performance improvement was observed as a result of the enhanced charge motion.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cleary et al. (2007) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: