Although polyazine extractants have been extensively studied as agents for partitioning trivalent actinides from lanthanides, an explanation for why certain azine compositions succeed and others fail is lacking. To address this issue, density functional theory calculations were used to evaluate fundamental properties (intrinsic binding affinity for a representative trivalent f-block metal, basicity, and hardness) for prototype azine donors pyridine, pyridazine, pyrimidine, pyrazine, 1,2,3-triazine, 1,2,4-triazine, and 1,3,5-triazine, as well as perform conformational analyses of bisazine chelates formed by directly connecting two donors together. The results provide criteria that both rationalize the behavior of known extractants, TERPY, TPTZ, hemi-BTP, BTP, BTBP, and BTPhen, and predict a new class of extractants based on pyridazine donor groups.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sahb et al. (2013) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: